Forthcoming

A Study on The Potential Value of Industry Collaboration in Interıor Design Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53463/8genart.202500416

Keywords:

Industry Collaboration, Interior Design Education, Practical Education, Professional Development

Abstract

The contemporary education process that emerged during the Republican Era aims to provide equal educational rights and conditions to all individuals defined as students. In order for this permanent education model not to remain merely theoretical, practice-oriented learning methods—particularly on-site and firsthand learning—have been developed, especially in fields that directly affect human life and living standards.
In interior architecture education, this approach is sustained through a combination of theoretical courses and practical components such as internships, workshops, fairs, and seminars, enabling students to adapt more easily to professional life after graduation. It is essential for students to engage with industry leaders, observe all stages of the design process, and follow production at various scales. Beyond these experiences, establishing early communication among producers, designers, and commercial stakeholders is crucial in helping students position themselves within the market.
Within this framework, the study on university–industry collaboration aims to identify existing shortcomings and propose solutions, providing a foundation for future collaborations in this field.

References

Acar, A. (2017). The contribution of technical visits to interior design education. Journal of Design Education Research, 5(2), 67–82.

Aykut, S. (2020). University-industry collaboration and interior design education. Journal of Architecture and Design Research, 12(1), 55–70.

Aykut, S. (2020). University-industry collaboration models in interior design education. Journal of Art and Design, 26(2), 45–63.

Chamber of Interior Architects of Turkey. (2004). Definition and scope of the interior architecture profession. TMMOB Promotional Publication.

CIDA. (2018). Council for Interior Design Accreditation Standards.

Council of Higher Education (YÖK). (2018). The Bologna process and the European higher education area. Council of Higher Education.

Council of Higher Education [YÖK]. (2020). National qualifications framework for higher education in interior architecture. Council of Higher Education

Demir, M. (2019). The role of technical tours in the experiential learning processes of interior design students. Journal of Art and Design, 24(1), 41–55.

Demirarslan, M. (2017). Internships and professional preparation processes in interior design education. Journal of Architecture and Design Education, 10(2), 44–62.

Gürel, M. Ö., & Anthony, K. H. (2006). The canon and the void: Gender, race, and class in design education. Journal of Architectural Education, 59(3), 66–76.

Gürsoy, H. (2021). Creative processes in interior architecture project studios. Journal of Art and Design Research, 9(2), 88–104.

IFI. (2011). International Federation of Interior Architects/Designers – Definition of Interior Architecture

Kavasoğulları, A. (2021). Effects of color and lighting system on user comfort in interior design. Mimarlık ve Yaşam, 6(2), 583–593.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Özsoy, V. (2015). Design education and applied learning in interior architecture. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Pile, J. F. (2007). Interior design (4th ed.). Pearson.

Razali, A. F., Zulkifli, A. P. M., & Mohamad, S. A. (2024). Design project classroom: Fostering industry-ready industrial designers through academic-industry collaboration. Wacana Seni Journal of Arts Discourse, 23, 55–72.

Smith, V. I. (2021). How interior designers charge for projects and services (2nd ed.): Payment options for interior design clients. Independently published.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2025

How to Cite

Arı Çokyürür, E., & Oral, M. (2025). A Study on The Potential Value of Industry Collaboration in Interıor Design Education. 8gen-ART, 5(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.53463/8genart.202500416