Evaluation Of Cultural Ecosystem Services At Historical Çeşnigir Bridge and Canyon Recreation Area

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53463/splandes.2021000085

Keywords:

Cultural Ecosystem Services, Recreation, Tourism, Spatial Planning, Çeşnigir

Abstract

Ecosystem services (ES) have been developed to
demonstrate and measure the direct or indirect
benefits people receive from ecosystems. According
to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment report,
Ecosystem Services grouped in 4 main category:
provisioning, regulating, cultural and supporting
services. Provisioning services and cultural services
are services that people benefit directly, regulating
services and supporting services indirectly. In the
study, cultural ecosystem services (cultural diversity,
spiritual and religious values, knowledge systems,
educational values, inspiration, aesthetic values,
social relations, sense of place, cultural heritage
values, recreation and ecotourism) provided by
Historical Çeşnigir Bridge and Canyon, locatedn in
between Karakeçili and Köprüköy in the city of
Kırkkale, were evaluated. The findings may help in
making decisions on spatial planning, recreation and
tourism planning and management based on cultural
ecosystem services.
Keywords: Cultural Ecosystem Services, Recreation,
Tourism, Spatial Planning, Çeşnigir

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bütünleşik Kentsel Gelişme Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı 2010-2023, T.C. Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı, KENTGES Erişim Tarihi: 25.12.2021 Erişim Adresi: https://kentges.csb.gov.tr/kentges-strateji-belgesi-i-282

Chan KMA, et al. (2011) Cultural services and non-use values. The Theory and Practice of Ecosystem Service Valuation in Conservation, eds Kareiva P, Daily G, Ricketts T, Tallis H, Polasky S (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford), pp 206–228.

Gomez-Baggethun E, De Groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C. 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ. 69:1209–18.

Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., Frumkin, H., 2014. Nature and health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 35, 207–228.

Karaahmetli Tabiat Parkı Uzun Devreli Gelişim Planı, (2009) Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Genel Müdürlüğü, Analitik Etüt Raporu, Sentez Raporu, BELDA LTD.

MEA - Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003), Ecosystem and Human Well-Being – A framework for Assessment, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington DC:Island Press.

MEA - Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being – Biodiversity Synthesis, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington DC: Island Press.

Tanrıbir, E. ve Akten, M. (2020). Isparta Kent Merkezinin Mekânsal Algı Değerlendirmesi. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 5(2), 165-180.

Published

31-12-2021

How to Cite

BİNGÜL BULUT, M. B., & DEMİREL, Öner. (2021). Evaluation Of Cultural Ecosystem Services At Historical Çeşnigir Bridge and Canyon Recreation Area. Journal of Spatial Planning and Design, 1(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.53463/splandes.2021000085