Determination of Flood Risk Areas and Carbon Sink Areas in The Scope of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: Case Study Of Çiğli, İzmir

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53463/splandes.202300184

Keywords:

Climate Change, Flood Risk Analysis, Carbon Sinks

Abstract

With the industrial revolution, the boundaries of urban and rural areas have expanded and the rural periphery has disappeared. Structural areas and transportation networks have dominated the cities and the spaces with natural character have begun to wear out. On the basis of this, increasing heavy metals and the inability of nature to renew itself have started to bring the phenomenon of climate change to the agenda. The decrease in the rate of green areas in cities and the loss of function of wetlands with strong natural characteristics have caused the ecosystem services not to continue throughout the city and countryside.

Çiğli District emerges as an important example for analyzing the interaction between the natural environment and the built environment, as it has been exposed to rapid industrialization and housing and contains an important Ramsar Site. Today, the biggest problems of Çiğli are the increasing amount of carbon and the flood risk. Within the scope of the study, areas with flood risk throughout Çiğli district were determined, in addition to this, the areas with the highest carbon emissions were determined and solution suggestions were presented.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Selim Utku Gümrükçü, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Urban Transformation, Izmir/Turkey

 

 

Hande Gündel, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Urban Transformation, İzmir/Turkey

 

 

Ayşe Kalaycı Önaç, İzmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Engineering-Architecture, Department of City and Regional Planning, Izmir/Turkey

 

 

 

References

Balaban, O. (2010). Climate Change and Citie: A review on the Impacts and Policy Responses. 21-44. DOI: 10.4305/METU.JFA.2012.1.2

Cea, L., & Costabile, P. (2022, February 17). Flood Risk in Urban Areas: Modelling, Management and Adaptation to Climate Change. A Review. Hydrology, pp. 1-35.

Davies, Z.G., Edmondson, J.L., Heinemeyer, A., Leake, J.R., Gaston, K.J.. (2011), Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above‐ground carbon storage at a city‐wide scale. J. Appl. Ecol., 48 (5) pp. 1125-1134

Duan, Y., Xiong, J., Cheng, W., Li, Y., Wang, N., Shen, G., & Yang, J. (2022, October 9). Increasing Global Flood Risk in 2005–2020 from a Multi-Scale Perspective. remote sensing, s. 1-21.

Dhakal, S., (2010), GHG emissions from urbanization and opportunities for urban carbon mitigationCurr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2 (4), 277-283.

Lähde, E., Di Marino, M., (2019), Multidisciplinary collaboration and understanding of green infrastructure. Results from the cities of Tampere, Vantaa and Jyväskylä (Finland) Urban For. Urban Green., 40. 63-72

Ersoy Mirici, M., (2021). Root-Cause Analysis on Causes of Carbon Emissions in Turkey, Landscape Research I, Ed. Öner Demirel, Ertan Düzgüneş, Livre de Lyon, ISBN: 978-2-38236-176-4, 501-514.

Kahraman, G. (2019). Türkiye’de Kentleşmenin Enerji Tüketimi ve Karbon Salınımı Üzerine Etkisi . Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology , 9 (3) , 1559-1566 . DOI: 10.21597/jist.548294

Hurtado, S. (2021). Adaptation to Climate Change as a Key Dimension of Urban Regeneration in Europe: The Cases of Copenhagen, Vienna, and Madrid. pp. 65-89.

Riedy, C. (2016). Climate Change. Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney. 1-15.

TUIK, 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions-Statistics-1990-2019-37196.

Baurov, A.A. (2021). Methods of Carbon Sequestration (Review). Polym. Sci. Ser. D 14, 603–605. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995421222010038

Francis, J., ( 2013). Re-imagining our cities as carbon sinks, People Planet 2013 Conf. Proc., 1-12.

Peroni, F., Pristeri, G., Codato, D., Pappalardo, S., & Marchi, M. (2020). Biotope Area Factor: An Ecological Urban Index to Geovisualize Soil Sealing in Padua, Italy. Sustainability, pp. 1-17.

Song, Z.L., Wang, H.L., Strong, P.J., Li, Z.M., Jiang, P.K., (2012). Plant impact on the coupled terrestrial biogeochemical cycles of silicon and carbon: Implications for biogeochemical carbon sequestration. Earth Sci Rev 319–331

Downloads

Published

06-06-2023

How to Cite

Gümrükçü, S. U., Gönüllü Sütçüoğlu, G., Gündel, H., & Kalaycı Önaç, A. (2023). Determination of Flood Risk Areas and Carbon Sink Areas in The Scope of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: Case Study Of Çiğli, İzmir. Journal of Spatial Planning and Design, 3(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.53463/splandes.202300184