Focusing on User-Centered Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53463/inda.20260282Keywords:
Ergonomics, anthropometry, mismatch, furniture design, user-centred designAbstract
This study explores the development of ergonomic lecture hall furniture at Kumasi Technical University, Ghana, using a user-centered approach. By analyzing the anthropometric data of 300 students (176 males; 124 females), researchers identified severe mismatches between current furniture and actual body dimensions. Key findings revealed that existing setups are largely unsuitable: approximately 64% of students used chairs of incorrect height, over 50% used seats with improper depth, and 100% used tables that were too high. Such discrepancies lead to physical discomfort, reduced focus, and potential long-term health issues. To address these gaps, the study utilized percentile-based design equations to calculate dimensions that accommodate a diverse student population. The results underscore the necessity of integrating human body measurements into furniture design. By closing the gap between user needs and classroom infrastructure, institutions can foster a more inclusive, healthy, and productive learning environment.
Downloads
References
Eldar, R., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2019). Ergonomic design visualization mapping-developing an assistive model for design activities. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 74, 102859.
Fidelis, O. P. & Ogunlade, B. (2022). Anthropometric perspective to classroom furniture ergonomics and the need for standards in Nigerian schools. Work, 72(1), 279-289.
Fidelis, O. P., Ogunlade, B., Adelakun, S. A., & Adukwu, O. (2018). Ergonomic analysis of classroom furniture in a Nigerian university. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 37(4), 1154-1161.
Kahya, E. (2019). Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures of university students. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 74, 102864.
Kibria, M. G., & Rafiquzzaman, M. (2019). Ergonomic Computer Workstation Design for University Teachers in Bangladesh. Jordan Journal of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, 13(2).
Lee, Y., & Yun, M. H. (2019). Evaluation of the guidelines and children’s ability to select the anthropometrically recommendable height of school furniture: A case study of Korean primary school children. Work, 64(3), 427-438.
Lu, C. W., & Lu, J. M. (2017). Evaluation of the Indonesian National Standard for elementary school furniture based on children's anthropometry. Applied ergonomics, 62, 168-181.
Mahantesh, M. M., Rao, K. R., Chandra, A. P., Vijayakumar, M. N., Nandini, B., Prasad, C. D., & Vasudev, H. (2023). Design and modeling using finite element analysis for the sitting posture of computer users based on ergonomic perspective. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 1-17.
Mokarami, H., Ansari, S., Cousins, R., & Varmazyar, S. (2022). Assessing the ergonomic status of commonly used chairs in Iran’s universities based on combinational equations and anthropometric indices. Work, 71(4), 1087-1095.
Mukhopadhyay, P. (2019). Ergonomics for the layman: applications in design. CRC Press.
Obinna, F. P., Sunday, A. A., & Babatunde, O. (2021). Ergonomic assessment and health implications of classroom furniture designs in secondary schools: a case study. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 22(1), 1-14.
Parvez, M. S., Rahman, A., & Tasnim, N. (2019). Ergonomic mismatch between students anthropometry and university classroom furniture. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(5), 603-631.
Pereira, M., Comans, T., Sjøgaard, G., Straker, L., Melloh, M., O'Leary, S., & Johnston, V. (2019). The impact of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion interventions on office worker productivity: A cluster-randomized trial. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 45(1), 42-52.
Pérez-Gosende, P. (2017). Anthropometry-Based Approach for Side-Mounted Desktop Chairs Design Evaluation for University Students in Ecuador.” In 2017 IEEE Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM), IEEE, 1–5.
Roebuck Jr, JA. (1999). Indian Anthropometric Dimensions for Ergonomic Design Practice By Debkumar Chakrabarti 1997, 161 pages, Rs 1500.00 (approx. US $35.34) Paldi, Ahmedabad, India: National Institute of Design ISBN 81-86199-15-0. Ergonomics in Design, 7(2), 37.
Satır, B., & Erdoğan, F. Ç. (2021). Comparison of classroom furniture to anthropometric measures of Turkish middle school students. Work, 70(2), 493-508.
Sejdiu, R., Sylejmani, B., Idrizi, L., Bajraktari, A., & Sejdiu, M. (2023). Discrepancy between pupils’ body and classroom furniture in elementary schools: A case study in the Republic of Kosovo. Work, 75(2), 447-459.
Stack, T., & Ostrom, L. T. (2023). Occupational ergonomics: A practical approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sekizgen Academy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
