Forthcoming

Evaluation of The Xeriscape Approach in The Context of Sustainable Water Management

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53463/ecopers.20250419

Keywords:

Xeriscape, sustainable water management, water conservation, climate-adaptive landscaping, drought, irrigation

Abstract

Urban water stress is intensifying under climate change, rapid urbanization, and increasing climate variability. Outdoor landscape irrigation—especially turf-dominated and high-water-demand planting—constitutes a substantial and often discretionary component of municipal water use, making it a critical target for demand-side water management. Xeriscape (drought-adaptive landscaping) provides an integrated design-and-management framework to reduce irrigation demand through climate-appropriate planning, hydro zoning, soil improvement, mulching, efficient irrigation, and maintenance practices. This review synthesizes international and Turkish evidence on xeriscape within sustainable urban water management and water-sensitive city (WSC) agendas. Following a scoping-review logic and thematic synthesis (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Peters et al., 2020), we examine foundational principles, performance evidence (water savings, costs, ecosystem co-benefits), enabling technologies and standards (ET0-based water budgets, smart irrigation), implementation barriers, and adaptation needs across climate regions. The literature indicates that meaningful water savings are achievable when plant selection, irrigation technology, soil/mulch practices, and monitoring are implemented as an integrated system rather than as isolated measures. For Türkiye, scaling xeriscape requires standardized water-budget targets, comparable monitoring indicators, a strengthened native plant supply chain, and policy instruments that combine technical guidance with incentives and public communication.

References

AIPH. (2025). The AIPH World Green City Awards (Riyadh – Saudi Arabia). Erişim tarihi 25 Aralık 2025, https://fgc2024.com/aiph/

Arksey, H. ve O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Avrupa Birliği. (2020). Regulation (EU) 2020/741 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 2020 on minimum requirements for water reuse. Official Journal of the European Union, L 177, 32–55. Erişim tarihi 25 Aralık 2025, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/741/oj

Brelsford, C. ve Abbott, J. K. (2021). How smart are “Water Smart Landscapes”? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 106, 102402. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102402

California Department of Water Resources. (2024). Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). Erişim tarihi 25 Aralık 2025, https://water.ca.gov/programs/water-use-and-efficiency/landscape-ordinance

Chalker-Scott, L. (2007). Impact of mulches on landscape plants and the environment—A review. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 25(4), 239–249.

Çetin, N. ve Mansuroğlu, S. (2018). Akdeniz koşullarında kurakçıl peyzaj düzenlemelerinde kullanılabilecek bitki türlerinin belirlenmesi: Antalya/Konyaaltı örneği. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 55(1), 11–18. https://dx.doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.390690

Çorbacı, Ö. L., Özyavuz, M. ve Yazgan, M. E. (2011). Peyzaj mimarlığında suyun akıllı kullanımı: Xeriscape. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, (1), 25–31.

Denver Water. (2025). Xeriscape: Seven principles. Erişim tarihi 25 Aralık 2025, https://www.denverwater.org/your-water/water-use/xeriscape

Green, J. C., Solins, J. P., Brissette, F. P. ve Benning, T. M. (2024). Shifting currents: A synthesis of urban water management and green infrastructure to inform planning at multiple scales. Journal of Urban Ecology, 10(1), juae003. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jue/juae003

Hassamancıoğlu, V. M., Yılmaz, G., Çelik, A. ve Erdoğdu, S. (2025). Kentsel açık yeşil alanların kurakçıl peyzaj tasarımına uygunluğunun değerlendirilmesi: Tokat kenti örneği. Research in Agricultural Sciences, 56(1), 50–65. https://dx.doi.org/10.17097/agricultureatauni.1508760

IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karaca, E. ve Kuşvuran, A. (2012). Çankırı kenti peyzaj düzenlemelerinde kullanılan bazı bitkilerin kurakçıl peyzaj açısından değerlendirilmesi. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, 5(2), 19–24.

Kaylı, A. ve Gölbey, A. G. (2020). Yeşil altyapı ve yeşil bina bileşeni olarak kurakçıl peyzaj uygulamaları. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 57(2), 303–311. https://dx.doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.669799

Nazemi Rafi, H., Kazemi, F. ve Tehranifar, A. (2020). Xeriscaping: A review of principles and plant selection. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 52, 126699. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126699

Öztaş Karlı, R. G. ve Artar, M. (2021). Kentsel su yönetiminde araç olarak su ayak izi ve mavi-yeşil altyapı. Kent Akademisi, 14(2), 158–175. https://dx.doi.org/10.35674/kent.887408

Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., … Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://dx.doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167

Saher, N. M., Bazaid, A. S., Alharbi, M., Alotaibi, N. A., Eid, E. M. ve Dhahri, A. A. (2022). Microclimate effects on irrigation needs in different vegetation types in Saudi Arabia. Hydrology, 9(6), 104. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9060104

St. Hilaire, R., Arnold, M. A., Wilkerson, D. C., Devitt, D. A., Hurd, B. H., Lesikar, B. J., … Zoldoske, D. F. (2008). Efficient water use in residential urban landscapes. HortScience, 43(7), 2081–2092.

Su Verimliliği Yönetmeliği. (2024, 27 Aralık). T.C. Resmî Gazete. Erişim tarihi 25 Aralık 2025, https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/

T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. (2024). Kurakçıl peyzaj uygulama rehberi. Erişim tarihi 25 Aralık 2025, https://www.suverimliligi.gov.tr/

UN-Water. (2024). Water stress. Erişim tarihi 25 Aralık 2025, https://www.unwater.org/water-facts/water-stress

UNESCO. (2024). United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for prosperity and peace. Paris: UNESCO. Erişim tarihi 25 Aralık 2025, https://www.unesco.org/reports/wwdr/2024/en

United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2023). WaterSense Water Budget Tool: User guide. Erişim tarihi 25 Aralık 2025, https://www.epa.gov/watersense/water-budget-tool

Ünsal, O. ve Çelik Çanga, M. (2023). Tokat şehir parklarının kurakçıl peyzaj tasarımına uygunluklarının belirlenmesi. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 200–208. https://dx.doi.org/10.24011/barofd.1306076

Van de Walle, J., Hill, C., Ali, S., Callahan, K. ve Erfani, R. (2023). Regulations and guidelines for residential greywater reuse: A critical review. npj Clean Water, 6, 20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41545-023-00236-6

Volo, T. J., Vivoni, E. R. ve Ruddell, B. L. (2015). An ecohydrological approach to conserving urban water through optimized landscape irrigation schedules. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 127–132. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.012

World Health Organization. (2006). Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater: Volume 4. Excreta and greywater use in agriculture. Geneva: WHO.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2025

How to Cite

Yavuz, E. E. N. (2025). Evaluation of The Xeriscape Approach in The Context of Sustainable Water Management. Ecological Perspective, 5(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.53463/ecopers.20250419

Issue

Section

Review Articles